A baro-aided GPS won't work.īut there is a downside. Keep in mind though, to fly them, you need a WAAS receiver. And, just like an ILS, an LPV approach's angular guidance scales down the closer you get to the runway. So how do they work? The extremely accurate WAAS system (7.6 meters or better accuracy) gives you lateral and vertical guidance down to a decision altitude (DA) like an ILS. The precision approach definition also carries a lot of documentation, definition, and cost with it, so the FAA and ICAO adopted the APV definition, so they could build new approaches and not be burdened with the cost and paperwork. So what's the difference? APV approaches don't meet the ICAO and FAA precision approach definitions, which apply mostly to localizer and glideslope transmitters. Instead, they're an approach with vertical guidance (APV). Even though LPV approaches have vertical guidance, they're not considered precision approaches. LPV approaches are a WAAS/GPS based approach, and they're very similar to the ILS. LPV: Localizer Performance With Vertical Guidance So what's the difference between LPV and LNAV/VNAV approaches? They're both GPS based approaches with vertical guidance, but the similarities end there. With GPS, the number of approaches with vertical guidance has tripled. Over the past several years, the FAA has created GPS based LPV and LNAV/VNAV approaches at thousands of airports across the US. And if you weren't flying an ILS, you were managing step-down altitudes on a non-precision approach. It wasn't that long ago when you only had one kind of approach with vertical guidance: the ILS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |